Accounting firms do not always garner headlines, and when they do, it tends not to be for good reasons. Things changed a little bit in this realm over the last week, though, as Mazars USA LLP ended its association with former president Donald Trump and his business interests while saying that it could no longer vouch for a decade’s worth of business statements.
Whether this accounting firm getting such attention is for
good reasons or not, well, that can be (and is being) spun in both ways. I will
try not to cast any such judgment in this space. Instead, I just want to look
at this from the accounting perspective.
What seems clear is that Mazars received some information
that led it to believe what was reflected in their financial statements for the
Trump Organization was not a complete, accurate portrait. This speaks to a key
cog in the accounting machine that the numbers reflected must be honest if they
are to reflect anything of value. There are many key questions here that still
need to be answered, though, before declaring how egregious any actions
surrounding these statements may be.
The obvious first big one is what did Mazars discover that
affected how it views that decade of statements? Some still large questions follow that one, however,
as to whether this was information that Mazars knew (or suspected), if they
were given outright false information, or if there was information that should
have been shared with them that was withheld.
This is because the reports that Mazars did are
compilations, which essentially means that they are largely based on
information provided to them by the client. They were not audited in any
meaningful way by Mazars itself.
What may be key to figuring out what is going on here is
that Mazars did not simply retract (and then presumably follow up by
correcting) the compiled statements. It also ended its relationship with the
Trump Organization. This would seem to imply that there was a breaking of
trust. It’s possible that in conversations with a client, an accounting firm
could discover that an honest mistake was made, but it can then be fixed and be
correct moving forward. That is not what happened here.
So even in this quick summation of what is happening, we
have hit upon honesty and trust, both pretty strong concepts. Again, I don’t
want to cast any judgment on what may or may not have happened here or cast
blame. For it is certainly plausible that this situation may just have become
too much for Mazars and it wants to step away. Instead, we will wait to see how
this is judged by those whose job it is to do so. I will, though, state how
important those concepts are to what we do and that clients, accountants, and
any third parties observing the work done between those two, deserve to have
things be clear and not lay in gray areas, and we commit ourselves to
accomplishing this.